When building web pages, deciding between Static Generation and Server-Side Rendering (SSR) is essential. Static Generation involves pre-rendering pages, while SSR renders pages dynamically. Let's explore the benefits and considerations of each approach to help you make an informed decision.
Static Generation:
<ul>
<li>Pre-render pages for fast CDN delivery.</li>
<li>Ideal for non-real-time data, such as marketing pages, blog posts, e-commerce listings, and documentation.</li>
<li>Offers faster page loading, improved scalability, SEO friendliness, and enhanced security.</li>
</ul>
Server-Side Rendering (SSR):
<ul>
<li>Renders pages on each user request.</li>
<li>Suitable for real-time data updates and complex interactions.</li>
<li>Ensures up-to-date content but can be slower than Static Generation.</li>
</ul>
Considerations:
<ul>
<li>Use Static Generation when pre-rendering is possible.</li>
<li>SSR is ideal for pages with frequently updated data or dynamic content.</li>
<li>Alternatively, consider client-side rendering or a hybrid approach for specific scenarios.</li>
</ul>
Selecting the right page generation approach is crucial. Static Generation offers speed and scalability, while SSR ensures real-time updates. Assess your content requirements to determine which method best suits your needs, or explore alternative strategies like client-side rendering or a hybrid approach.

Elle Majors

Choosing between Static and Server-Side Rendering